If you try to sit, I’ll tax your seat.
If you get too cold, I’ll tax the heat,
If you take a walk, I’ll tax your feet.
If you drive a car, I’ll tax the street,
— The Beatles in “The Taxman”
Of the 17 lawyers who have served as
chief justice of the United States, John Marshall — the fourth chief justice — has come to be known as the “ Great Chief Justice.” The folks who have given him that title are the Anti-progressives (that dare to call themselfs progressives) who have largely re-written the history we are taught in government schools. They revere him because he is the ignorant progenitor of federal power.
Marshall’s opinions over a 34-year period during the nation’s infancy — expanding federal power at the expense of personal freedom and the sovereignty of the states — set a pattern for federal control of our lives and actually invited Congress to regulate areas of human behavior nowhere mentioned in the Constitution. He was Thomas Jefferson’s cousin, but they rarely spoke. No chief justice in history has so pronouncedly and creatively offered the feds power on a platter as he.
Now he has a rival.
No one can know the true motivations for the idiosyncratic rationale in the health care decision written by Marshall’s current successor, John Roberts. Often five member majorities on the court are fragile, and bizarre compromises are necessary in order to keep a five-member majority from becoming a four-member minority. Perhaps Chief INJustice Roberts really means what he wrote — that congressional power to tax is without constitutional limit(?) — and his opinion is a faithful reflection of that view, without a political or legal or intra-court agenda. But that view finds no support in the Constitution or our history. It even contradicts the most famous of Marshall’s big government aphorisms: “The power to tax is the power to destroy.”
The reasoning underlying the 5 to 4 majority opinion is the court’s unprecedented pronouncement that Congress’ power to tax is unlimited. The majority held that the THEFT of thousands of dollars per year by the IRS from individuals who do not have health insurance is not a fine(?), not a punishment(?), not a payment for government-provided health insurance(?), not a shared responsibility(?) — all of which the statute says it is — but rather is an inducement in the form of a tax(?).